These concepts are based on the prioritization of quantity over quality, which fits it with the aims of profit-based economies. Such concepts therefore represent direct attempts to exploit the consumer, as opposed to providing the consumer a valuable product or service. What is most shocking about these facts is that the American economy is deliberately planned around waste, materialism, consumerism and the continuation of the materials cycle for the sake of the materials cycle itself.
One is left with the image of American society as a vacant, empty inhumane process. An ethical crisis emerges from the film: is this the kind of economic model we want to live in? At the same time, it gives us an opportunity: there is no fait accompli that all business models must accept this mode.
The film provides a challenge to young business leaders and students to think of alternative. Perhaps, this is because I was already inclined to view materialist and consumerist culture and economy with suspicion. The film provided robust arguments as to why such an economy and culture should be called into question. In this regard, I would not disagree with anything presented in the film, since I have no allegiances to the consumerist ideology which it is so thoroughly attacks.
At the same time, as a student of business, I am of course interested in the topic: therefore, the film made me think about alternative business practices. As mentioned above, business does not necessarily have to function according to the materials economy model: for example, quality could be emphasized over quantity. Griseri and Seppala identify four approaches to addressing environmental issues — deep, dark, light, bright see environmental ethics lecture slides.
Which approach es do the videos promote? I think the film includes all four of the approaches that Griseri and Seppala outline in various forms. To take a light or bright approach in this view means that we have to re-think our consumerist habits. Do you agree with this view? I think that this comment is especially relevant: what is at stake in environmental issues are fundamental questions about how we live and organize ourselves, what are our values, and how we behave on individual levels.
Therefore, all these sides must interact and participate to affect the required change. What are the limitations of these responses? Companies may look at the material economy and similar concepts to affect change.
For example, the materials economy produces waste which harms the environment: companies have to note that the materials economy does not exist in a vacuum. Furthermore, companies have to question their strategies of planned and perceived obsolescence.
These strategies are just meant to perpetuate consumerism through means that as side-effects produce waste, damage the environment and create a vacant culture. In this regard, the most fundamental companies can do is ask themselves a difficult existential question: why do we exist as a company? Is it merely to turn a profit? Babies are getting the most toxins in their system because of mothers and using their Annie defines the life cycle as material economy and, in turn, she divides the life cycle into five stages: extraction, production, distribution, consumption, and disposal.
Some environmental theories and neo-Marxist theory can be applied into the five stages to explore the environmental impact of capitalism. Extraction shows us a debate on human exemptionalism paradigm and new ecological paradigm. Human exemptionalism paradigm stresses on the ability of humans overcoming environment problems. However, is the definition right? The answer is, absolutely, no. In the Haitian countryside, for instance, some aboriginal families were swept away by the mudslides.
The contributing factor of the disaster was that the reduction of forest coverage rate gave rise to soil erosion Leonard. The forest is regarded as an economic resource; therefore, deforestation lowers the forest coverage rate every year. This case demonstrates that the ecological environment takes revenge on human beings. Clearly, human beings are not exempt from environment problems, and the ecological laws cannot be repealed, according to new ecological paradigm This is my analysis of the story of stuff.
One major theme of this video is to explain how the U. The first way that we use up our resources is deforestation. This is when we cut down a large number of trees in order to make it into products to sell. The next major theme is production. This is the stage where after the extraction has taken place, the material is sent to a factory to be made into a product.
A problem we run into during this stage is that we use energy to create products out of these materials and this releases toxins into the products. This is a problem because these toxins could be extremely harmful to us, and the environment around us. The next stage is distribution. This is where companies sell their products to stores, where they will be sold to consumers. For instance when you see a car in a lot, that car has gone from being mined out of the ground for metal, to being built in a factory, and last being taken to the lot to be sold.
That is a long process for as much money as you will pay for the car. This means that if you are not The story of Stuff. Everything is made of one hidden stuff. The story of stuff is basically about the causes and effects of production, distribution and disposal on people and the world as a whole. Annie Leonard, an environmental activist clearly states ways companies in the United States misuse our natural resources through deforestation and so many other ways to feed their selfish needs.
In the video Annie Leonard, actually criticizes the government and how poorly things work in the production world. During her presentation she wisely uses animations and drawings to make her presentation very interesting whiles sending her message across. Most of the stuffs she says about extraction and uneven distribution of money are just simple truth. One captivating part is how she casts light on how companies externalize the true cost of production by paying with our health, natural resources and etcetera.
She provides examples by stating how kids in some developing countries are forced into child labor to However, it is obvious that homework is not necessary everyday. First off, daily homework is unnecessary because of health issues. Another health issue is the lack of fresh air.
|Story of stuff essays||849|
|Story of stuff essays||Kindergarten sight word homework|
|Essays about students wearing uniforms||638|
|King kong theorie resume||636|
|Write good cover letter marketing position||Introduction-Chapter 1. For instance, someone is an expert on the economy while someone else is an expert on ecology. The expanded global economy rooted in capitalism as a worldview has normalized overconsumption. Let our experts help you. Give us your email and we'll send you the essay you need. For an example, the oldest Daughter is very disrespectful.|