Many historical essays can still be found at Meta. Before creating an essay, it is a good idea to check if similar essays already exist. Although there is no guideline or policy that explicitly prohibits it, writing redundant essays is discouraged. Avoid creating essays just to prove a point or game the system.
Essays that violate one or more Wikipedia policies, such as spam , personal attacks , copyright violations , or what Wikipedia is not tend to get deleted or transferred to user space. You do not have to have created an essay to improve it. If an essay already exists, you can add to, remove from, or modify it as you wish , provided that you use good judgment.
However, essays placed in the User: namespace are often—though not always—meant to represent the viewpoint of one user only. You should usually not substantively edit someone else's user essay without permission. If the original author is no longer active or available, seek consensus on the essay's talk page other editors who have worked on the essay are likely to care about it , or just write a new one.
Wikipedia:Essay directory lists about essays to allow searching for key words or terms with your browser. The gist of user-written essays can be found at Wikipedia:Essays in a nutshell. Essays can also be navigated via categories , the navigation template as seen below , or Special:Search as seen below; include the words "Wikipedia essays" with your other search-words. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
This is an explanatory supplement to the policy on essays. This page is intended to provide additional information about concepts in the page s it supplements. This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines , as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. See also: Category:Wikipedia essays. Further information: Wikipedia:Information pages. See also: Category:Wikipedia information pages and Category:Wikipedia how-to. See also: Category:WikiProjects. Further information: Wikipedia:User pages.
See also: Category:User essays. See also: Meta:Category:Essays. Main page: Wikipedia:Wikipedia essays. Items sent here are usually discussed for seven days; then they are either deleted by an administrator or kept sometimes with modifications, which may include moving or merging , based on community consensus as evident from the discussion, consistent with policy, and with careful judgment of the rough consensus if required. Pages which are not specifically being posted for deletion can also be moved through the requested moves WP:RM process.
Conversely, an attempt to replace the rather stern WP:Give 'em enough rope with a much more mild-toned "WP:Let the tiger show its stripes" was rejected by consensus, and the latter eventually deleted as redundant. Some essays, like WP:Advice for hotheads , are intentionally written with such history in mind, and are worded to not offend and to advise against using them in attempts to offend.
Wikipedia essays. Essays on building, editing, and deleting content. Articles must be written All Five Pillars are the same height Avoid vague introductions Be a reliable source Civil POV pushing Cohesion Competence is required Concede lost arguments Dissent is not disloyalty Don't lie Don't search for objections Editing Wikipedia is like visiting a foreign country Editors will sometimes be wrong Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia Explanationism External criticism of Wikipedia Here to build an encyclopedia Most ideas are bad Need Neutrality of sources Not editing because of Wikipedia restriction The one question Oversimplification Paradoxes Paraphrasing POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields Process is important Product, process, policy Purpose Reasonability rule Systemic bias There is no seniority Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia Tendentious editing The role of policies in collaborative anarchy The rules are principles Trifecta Wikipedia in brief Wikipedia is an encyclopedia Wikipedia is a community.
Avoid thread mode Gender-neutral language Proseline Use feminine pronouns Write the article first Writing about women Writing better articles. Adjectives in your recommendations AfD is not a war zone Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions Arguments to make in deletion discussions Avoid repeated arguments Before commenting in a deletion discussion But there must be sources!
Confusing arguments mean nothing Content removal Counting and sorting are not original research Delete the junk Does deletion help? Don't confuse stub status with non-notability Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument Follow the leader How to save an article proposed for deletion I just don't like it Identifying blatant advertising Identifying test edits Immunity Keep it concise Liar liar pants on fire Nothing Nothing is clear Overzealous deletion Relisting can be abusive Relist bias The Heymann Standard Unopposed AFD discussion Wikipedia is not Whack-A-Mole Why was the page I created deleted?
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork No Encyclopedic Use. Essays on civility. Accepting other users Apology Contributing to complicated discussions Divisiveness Edit at your own pace Encouraging the newcomers Enjoy yourself Expect no thanks High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors How to be civil Maintaining a friendly space Negotiation Obsessive—compulsive disorder editors Relationships with academic editors Thank you Too long; didn't read Truce Unblock perspectives.
A weak personal attack is still wrong Advice for hotheads An uncivil environment is a poor environment Be the glue Beware of the tigers! Civility warnings Deletion as revenge Failure Forgive and forget It's not the end of the world Nobody cares Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals Old-fashioned Wikipedian values Profanity, civility, and discussions Revert notification opt-out Shadowless Fists of Death! Staying cool when the editing gets hot The grey zone The last word There is no Divine Right Of Editors Most ideas are bad Nothing is clear The rules of polite discourse There is no common sense Two wrongs don't make a right Wikipedia is not about winning Writing for the opponent Reader.
Argue better Assume good faith Assume the assumption of good faith Assume no clue Avoid personal remarks Avoid the word "vandal" Be excellent to one another Beyond civility Call a spade a spade Candor Deny recognition Desist Discussing cruft Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass Encourage full discussions Get over it How to lose Imagine others complexly Just drop it Keep it down to earth Mind your own business Say "MOBY" No Nazis Read before commenting Settle the process first.
Essays on notability. Advanced source searching All high schools can be notable Alternative outlets Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions Articles with a single source Avoid template creep Bare notability Big events make key participants notable Bombardment Businesses with a single location But it's true! Humorous essays. Spear-Shake Go ahead, vandalize How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb? How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle Is that even an essay?
You don't have to be mad to work here, but. About essays. Essay guide Value of essays Difference between policies, guidelines and essays Don't cite essays as if they were policy Avoid writing redundant essays Finding an essay Quote your own essay. About policies and guidelines Policies Guidelines How to contribute to Wikipedia guidance Policy writing is hard.
User essays. User essays on BLP. User essays on deletion. For other uses, see Controversy disambiguation. Main article: Benford's law of controversy. Listen to this article 8 minutes. This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 27 June , and does not reflect subsequent edits. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Archived from the original on Retrieved Public Understanding of Science. S2CID Fischhoff Nature Climate Change. Bibcode : NatCC Mandel SSRN The American Economic Review.
CiteSeerX ISSN JSTOR Archived from the original PDF on Kahneman Bibcode : Sci PMID Journal of Environmental Psychology. The New York Times. Cohen; Paul Slovic; John Gastil Lepper Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Public Opinion Quarterly. Lott Jr Donohue III Shooting down the more guns, less crime hypothesis. National Bureau of Economic Research. Steyvers; M.
Banks Bibcode : Natur.
|How to write letter for business||Professional college essay proofreading service online|
|Essay controversy wikipedia||272|
|Sample media sales resume||About essays About essays Essay guide Value of essays Difference between policies, guidelines and essays Don't cite essays as if they were policy Avoid writing redundant essays Finding an essay Quote your own essay. Authority outweighs evidence, at least for as long as the authority lives. If you must choose between an easily verifiable source that's barely reliable and a very reliable source that's barely verifiable, choose the more reliable source. You don't have to be mad to work here, essay controversy wikipedia. View this post on Instagram.|
|Essay controversy wikipedia||Download as Essay controversy wikipedia Printable version. Help them to get it. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. Articles on artists and works by artists often include material describing the opinions of critics, peers, and reviewers. Accepting other users Apology Contributing to complicated discussions Divisiveness Edit at your own pace Encouraging the newcomers Enjoy yourself Expect no thanks High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors How to be civil Maintaining a friendly space Negotiation Obsessive—compulsive disorder editors Relationships with academic editors Thank you Too long; didn't read Truce Unblock perspectives.|